Just wanted to point out this passage from a Daily Caller story about who was right and wrong in the ever-shifting Trayvon Martin story. I find the word choice revealing:
Both Martin and Zimmerman have faced a thorough character-vetting process as prominent activists and politicians ensure a continued national focus on the tragedy. Both men share rocky backgrounds, with Martin having been suspended from school on multiple occasions for various reasons and Zimmerman having previous run-ins with the law.
Martin’s disciplinary history showed no sign of physical aggression, though; a fact that offers Zimmerman’s claims of self-defense little support in the court of public opinion.
So the Daily Caller views this as a “character-vetting process?” As if Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman were possible vice presidential picks rather than involved in a criminal investigation?





